Shifting the Narrative: Autism, Neurodiversity, and the Need for Informed Conversations

In recent months, certain media outlets—have highlighted stories about autism with a focus on prevention, often linking it to maternal choices during pregnancy. One article, for example, recently ran a headline in large capital letters: "The Food That Can Lower the Risk of AUTISM by 20% if Eaten When Pregnant."

This kind of narrative invites concern, especially for expectant mothers. On the surface, it seems like a thinly veiled helpful health tip. However, from a neuro-inclusion perspective, it raises questions about how we talk about autism and neurodiversity in society.

Why is there a sudden increase in articles that emphasize prevention?

What impact do these conversations have on the Autistic community & how do people in society view autism itself?

Number 1: Autism Is a Difference, Not a Defect

One of the challenges with articles that focus on preventing autism is the implication that autism is inherently harmful. While autism presents unique challenges, it is also part of the natural diversity of human neurodevelopment. Autistic individuals contribute significantly to society, offering valuable perspectives and strengths. When media emphasizes prevention, it risks framing autism as a condition that should be avoided rather than a difference to be understood and supported. It perpetuates the idea that autism is an inherently harmful condition, something to be fixed or eradicated. This pathologizing of neurodiversity ignores the fact that autism is not a disease but a neurological difference. Many autistic individuals thrive and contribute significantly to society, yet these articles continue to promote the notion that autism is a "tragedy" to be feared.

From a neuro-inclusion standpoint, the goal should not be to prevent autism but to build environments where people of all neurotypes, including autistic individuals, can thrive. Society benefits from embracing neurodiversity, which begins with shifting our focus from "prevention" to acceptance and inclusion.

Number 2: Mothers and the Weight of Responsibility

A recurring theme in articles like these is the suggestion that a mother’s choices during pregnancy have a direct impact on whether her child will be autistic. In this case, the claim is that eating fish can reduce the risk of autism by 20%. But it’s essential to consider the limitations of studies like this:

1. Self-Reported Data: The data in these studies is often based on mothers’ recollections of their diets, which introduces the possibility of errors or incomplete reporting.

2. Observational Nature: These studies can show correlations but cannot definitively establish cause-and-effect relationships.

3. Complex Factors: Autism is influenced by various genetic, biological, and environmental factors. It cannot be reduced to a single dietary choice.

The emphasis on maternal behaviour places a disproportionate burden on mothers, suggesting that they are primarily responsible for their child’s neurodevelopmental outcomes. From a more balanced perspective, it’s essential to recognize the complexity of neurodiversity. Genetics and other factors contribute to whether a child is neurotypical or neurodivergent.

Instead of focusing on blame or responsibility, we should centre conversations on best supporting all children, regardless of their neurotype. This means creating inclusive spaces that accommodate diverse needs, offering support to families, and recognizing the strengths and challenges that come with neurodivergence.

Reframing the Conversation

Rather than treating autism as something to be "prevented," we can shift the conversation toward understanding and acceptance. Autistic individuals, like all people, deserve environments that respect and support their unique ways of processing the world. While health recommendations during pregnancy are important, they should not be framed in a way that reinforces fear or blame.

When we talk about autism, the focus should be on how we can build a more inclusive society. This means ensuring that autistic individuals can access the resources, accommodations, and support they need to succeed. It also means challenging the idea that neurotypical development is the only "ideal" outcome.

Building a Neuro-Inclusive Future

From a neuro-inclusion perspective, it’s important to emphasize that autism is not a problem to be solved but a difference to be respected. Autistic individuals have unique strengths and challenges; society benefits from embracing this diversity. Articles that focus on prevention often miss the opportunity to discuss how we can create spaces where autistic individuals are supported and valued for who they are.

We can foster a more compassionate, understanding society by shifting the narrative away from prevention and toward inclusion. Neurodiversity is a fundamental part of what makes us human, and the goal should be to ensure that every person, regardless of neurotype, has the opportunity to thrive.

In conclusion, rather than focusing on preventing autism, we can focus on better supporting neurodivergent individuals and their families. This approach promotes understanding, reduces stigma, and helps build a world where everyone—neurotypical or neurodivergent—can thrive. Conversations about autism should centre on inclusion, respect, and acceptance, ensuring we celebrate the full scale human diversity.